The Cuban regime delivers its “national terrorist list” to Interpol
The Cuban regime handed over its “national terrorist list” to Interpol, including important figures from exile in Miami. influencers and social communicators.
Government portal Cubedebate confirmed that the Ministry of Interior (MININT) sent “to the International Criminal Police Organization, better known as INTERPOL, a resolution of the Ministry of Interior that appeared in the Official Gazette of December 7, 2023.”
Likewise, he confirmed that the police entity, of which 196 countries are part, “has a national list of people and organizations that are subject to criminal investigation and wanted by the Cuban authorities.”
That media outlet, the regime’s spokesman, said the list includes “those who have committed terrorist acts affecting civilians or property since 1999, inside or outside the country,” who have “made attempts on the life of the president.” The republic or other officials of the State” and who “instigated, organized or provided financial support to actions contrary to the peace and civil security.”
all of them Classified as a “terrorist” by the Cuban regime They live in the United States, mainly in Florida, with the exception of one person who lives in Belgium.
The list of 61 individuals and 19 entities that Havana accuses of sponsoring terrorism in Cuba includes several investigative files and was revealed in response to Cuba’s inclusion on a list of countries that sponsor terrorism that the United States publishes each year.
In addition to the names of old Cuban exiles who have historically been attacked by the regime, the list includes, among others, dissidents Elicer Avila, Liudmila Santisteban Cruz, Manuel Milanes Pizonero, and influencers Alain Lambert Sánchez (Cuban paparazzi). Jorge Ramon Batista Calero (Ultrac) and Alexander Otaola Castle.
Havana after announcing the list in December last year Threatened with extradition and prosecution in absentia to the citizens included therein.
Many of the Cubans included in the list responded to the regime that the move would not mean a change in their intentions for them. A complaint against arbitrariness of the government.