Categories: Health

A French study supports the risk of menstrual disorders caused by vaccines

The risk of menstrual disorders is slightly increased during the three months following administration of an anti-Covid messenger RNA vaccine, a study released this Wednesday by French health authorities suggests, while such a link remains debated in the scientific community.

The study “shows a 20% increase in the risk of menstrual bleeding requiring hospital treatment within one to three months” after receiving the Pfizer vaccine or Moderna, the Epi-Fare Institute, which brings the drugs together, summarized in a press release. Responsible for the protection of individuals in terms of authority and social security, especially health.

Since the start of the anti-Covid vaccination campaign almost two and a half years ago, many women have reported disruptions in their menstrual cycles. Based on these statements, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) included the presence of heavy menstrual bleeding as a possible side effect of the messenger RNA vaccine, which is from Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna. However, studies on the topic remain conflicting. Epi-Fare provides arguments in favor of the existence of such a link.

Temporary disorder

Researchers identified the vaccination status of thousands of women hospitalized for heavy menstrual bleeding in 2021 and 2022. They compared their condition with a control group of women who were not treated for this reason. Finally, they conclude that the risk of such menstrual irregularities is slightly higher when a woman receives the Moderna or Pfizer vaccine for the first time, each given in two successive doses. The risk lasts for three months and then, even after a subsequent booster dose, disappears.

These results contrast with a larger study conducted in Sweden and published in Spring 2023 in the BMJ. This led to the conclusion that there is no solid evidence of a link between Covid vaccination and menstrual disorders. Asked about these different findings, the AP-Ferre researchers pointed to a difference in methodology.

They note in particular that the Swedish study considered a period of risk that began barely more than a week after the vaccination of the patients. This type of choice “can lead to a potential risk increase after a while,” explained epidemiologist Rosemary Drey-Spira, who oversaw the French study, later choosing to wait a month after the first dose of the vaccine.




Source link

Admin

Share
Published by
Admin

Recent Posts

100 million degrees for 48 seconds: South Korea’s ‘artificial sun’ moves closer to nuclear revolution

This is a new record that scientists from the Korea Fusion Energy Institute (KFE) have…

6 months ago

The report offers solutions for insurers facing future growth in natural disasters

Damages associated with drought, floods, hail and other increasingly violent events are expected to increase…

6 months ago

You still have time to claim this exciting investigation

An estimated 9 million people in the United States are still waiting for their final…

6 months ago

IDF recognizes “serious mistake” in killing seven members of NGO World Central Kitchen

The death of seven humanitarian workers from the American NGO World Central Kitchen in an…

6 months ago

Fortnite Shop Apr 3, 2024 – Fortnite

Today, at one o'clock in the morning, Gamer updates it Boutique de Fortnite Through the…

6 months ago

Sharon Stone tried to make a Barbie movie in the 1990s

The Basic Instinct and Casino actress looks back at a time in Hollywood when adapting…

6 months ago