Michael OherWhose story inspired the film?a possible dreampointed to oscar In 2010, Tuohy is filing a lawsuit against the family who adopted her and whose story was featured on the big screen (via) espn,
Ohr alleges that he was never effectively adopted by the family, that he profited financially from his story, and that he was never compensated for the film adaptation of his biography.
While the book and film based on Ohr’s story were released, Player claims he never received a share of the profits.
Now, many netizens are posting the inexplicable saying Sandra BullockWho returned the Oscar for starring in the feature film best Actress After his commendable performance.
I Think It’s Perfect That Sandra Bullock Gives Back Her Oscar In A Show Of Solidarity #SandraBullockRecall https://t.co/dzFF7olXOW
— Matt Erspamer (@erspamer_matt) 14 August 2023
“I think it is absolutely right that Sandra Bullock should return her Oscar in solidarity.”
Sad that Sandra Bullock will have to return her Oscar https://t.co/ghmJphpKzA
— Ronan Barradas (@ronanbarradas) 18 August 2023
Wait, so is this beautiful and inspiring story told by Hollywood not real? Give back our taxpayer-funded Oscars, Sandra Bullock.
— Rodrigo Geraldi (@OrelhadovanGogh) 18 August 2023
Of course, on the other hand, other netizens commented on the absurdity of the request, as Bullock was merely playing the part she was given.
I don’t understand why they want Sandra Bullock to return the Oscar for something that has nothing to do with them, man, that woman just lost her husband. The movie was based on true events, of course it’s not entirely real and + he was hired to act, he didn’t write the script for the movie,*
— Tania (@taniaaribeiro00) 18 August 2023
This story here is worse than Larissa Manoela’s, but Sandra Bullock’s Oscar return is very much on. We know that a film is an adaptation to look good and the actor works within what is written. Here’s the villain boy’s family https://t.co/H3ys5SEoNE
— Bruna Machado (@brunapmp) 18 August 2023
Sandra Bullock is living in mourning and people are demanding the return of Oscar for which she is not even guilty. They’ll Charge the Oscar They Bought from Gwyneth Paltrow pic.twitter.com/MPM7eQo8tW
— ☮️ Mi_ SummersBritney❣️ (@BritBuffySpears) 18 August 2023
according to website daily Mail, Bull She was deeply affected by allegations that her role may have been based on a lie.
the actress who starred leah anne tuhi In the film, she feels that the hard work and dedication she put into a story she believed to be true has been undermined by recent revelations.
“Now people won’t see it, and if they do, they’ll have a completely different reaction to the original intent.” The source insisted that Sandra Bullock It is a matter of regret that a special moment in his life ended due to a changed perspective.
The situation has become difficult for the actress who recently faced the loss of her partner. Brian Randleand is battling turmoil in both her personal and professional life.
Despite the adverse circumstances, Sandra Bullock it is “Showing strength and looking forward to better days ahead“, as revealed from the source. while some critical voices suggested that he should “put her back.” oscar In best ActressFollowing the controversy, her fans on social networks came to her defense.
The lawsuit, filed in a Tennessee court, alleges that Oher was tricked into signing a document giving Tuohies the authority to act on her behalf, under the false claim that becoming a “legal guardian” was a legal requirement. was equivalent to being a legal guardian. Ohr claims that this allowed Tuohies to pose as his foster parent for financial gain.
According to him, the agreement included the Tuohy family and their biological children, who received a substantial payment for the rights to the story and a percentage of the project’s undefined earnings.
Ohr, whose career on NFL Started in 2009, he says he only had time to double-check the legal details after his retirement in 2016. The lawsuit raises questions about the exploitation of real-life stories for financial purposes and highlights the complexity behind film adaptations.
Remember the trailer: